Online access to case information for payments in pick juvenile and domestic relations district courts. Cases could possibly be searched using name, case number, or hearing date.
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon with the prosecution against the petitioner and his earlier mentioned mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined through the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated 2-twelve-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the summary or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court could interfere with the conclusion or maybe the finding and mold the relief to make it acceptable to the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified from the decision on the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
maintaining the conviction awarded into the appellant reduce the sentence of the appellant from imprisonment for life to 1 already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced to your period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It's also a well-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.
The ruling on the first court created case law that must be accompanied by other courts right up until or Unless of course possibly new legislation is created, or even a higher court rules differently.
There are innumerable cases where death was never supposed – even more where those nominated within the FIR were not present when the injury or death occurred. The death of a human being is often a tragic event. But the death of any living being is no considerably less a tragic event.
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based within the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances with the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution might be justified when the basic norm underlying a Constitution disappears plus a new system is put in its place.
The DCFS social worker in charge with the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her 6-month report for the court, the worker elaborated about the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved get more info her plan.
one. Judicial Independence: The court emphasised the importance of judicial independence plus the separation of powers.
It is also important to note that granting of seniority to some civil servant without the actual size of service pretty much violates the whole service framework to be a civil servant inducted in Grade 17 by claiming this sort of benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher quality, which is neither the intention of the regulation nor from the equity. Read more